800-270-8184
Elk Grove Telemarketing Fraud Criminal Defense Lawyers
Elk Grove California Telemarketing Fraud Charges
- 24 hour service
- Over 50 years of combined defense experience
- Affordable rates and payment plans
- Call us 800-270-8184 / email info@wiselaws.com
At Wise Laws, our Elk Grove lawyers multiply an energetic defense for individuals and businesses charged with Elk Grove CA telemarketing fraud. Wise Laws represent clients from around the country. If you have been accused of operating fraudulent schemes using telephones, it is important to have experienced legal representation.
You will find that our attorneys are experienced, creative and dedicated to resolving your legal problem. Elk Grove CA Conviction of telemarketing fraud can carry major penalties. It is important to have a seasoned defense team when fighting Elk Grove California telemarketing fraud charges.
Some Elk Grove California Telemarketing Fraud Charges include:
-
Elk Grove California Charity schemes
-
Elk Grove Prize promotion giveaways
-
Elk Grove Public official impersonation
-
Asking for advanced payment without sending goods
-
Selling names of people whom have been defrauded
-
Elk Grove Magazine schemes
-
Elk Grove Office equipment schemes
-
Elk Grove California Lottery ticket schemes
-
Elk Grove Tax payment schemes
-
Elk Grove Vending machine fraud
-
Elk Grove Loan schemes
-
Elk Grove Jury service fraud schemes
In general, Elk Grove California telemarketing schemes involve promising something of value over the telephone and the victim has made not delivering it after payment. Such charges can also involve obtaining credit card information by telephone and then making use of the victim’s credit. If you have been accused of operating a Elk Grove CA telemarketing scheme along these lines, it is in your best interests to seek legal counsel right away.
If you are facing any telemarketing fraud charges in Elk Grove, you can be assured that Wise Laws will help in defending you effectively, working to recognize weaknesses in the prosecution’s case that lead to reasonable doubt among members of the jury.
