Alhambra Telemarketing Fraud Criminal Defense Lawyers

Alhambra California Telemarketing Fraud Charges

  • 24 hour service
  • Over 50 years of combined defense experience
  • Affordable rates and payment plans
  • Call us 800-270-8184 / email

At Wise Laws, our Alhambra lawyers multiply an energetic defense for individuals and businesses charged with Alhambra CA telemarketing fraud. Wise Laws represent clients from around the country. If you have been accused of operating fraudulent schemes using telephones, it is important to have experienced legal representation.

You will find that our attorneys are experienced, creative and dedicated to resolving your legal problem. Alhambra CA Conviction of telemarketing fraud can carry major penalties. It is important to have a seasoned defense team when fighting Alhambra California telemarketing fraud charges.

Some Alhambra California Telemarketing Fraud Charges include:

  • Alhambra California Charity schemes

  • Alhambra Prize promotion giveaways

  • Alhambra Public official impersonation

  • Asking for advanced payment without sending goods

  • Selling names of people whom have been defrauded

  • Alhambra Magazine schemes

  • Alhambra Office equipment schemes

  • Alhambra California Lottery ticket schemes

  • Alhambra Tax payment schemes

  • Alhambra Vending machine fraud

  • Alhambra Loan schemes

  • Alhambra Jury service fraud schemes

In general, Alhambra California telemarketing schemes involve promising something of value over the telephone and the victim has made not delivering it after payment. Such charges can also involve obtaining credit card information by telephone and then making use of the victim’s credit. If you have been accused of operating a Alhambra CA telemarketing scheme along these lines, it is in your best interests to seek legal counsel right away.

If you are facing any telemarketing fraud charges in Alhambra, you can be assured that Wise Laws will help in defending you effectively, working to recognize weaknesses in the prosecution’s case that lead to reasonable doubt among members of the jury.