Stamford Telemarketing Fraud Criminal Defense Lawyers

Stamford Connecticut Telemarketing Fraud Charges

  • 24 hour service
  • Over 50 years of combined defense experience
  • Affordable rates and payment plans
  • Call us 800-270-8184 / email

At Wise Laws, our Stamford lawyers multiply an energetic defense for individuals and businesses charged with Stamford CT telemarketing fraud. Wise Laws represent clients from around the country. If you have been accused of operating fraudulent schemes using telephones, it is important to have experienced legal representation.

You will find that our attorneys are experienced, creative and dedicated to resolving your legal problem. Stamford CT Conviction of telemarketing fraud can carry major penalties. It is important to have a seasoned defense team when fighting Stamford Connecticut telemarketing fraud charges.

Some Stamford Connecticut Telemarketing Fraud Charges include:

  • Stamford Connecticut Charity schemes

  • Stamford Prize promotion giveaways

  • Stamford Public official impersonation

  • Asking for advanced payment without sending goods

  • Selling names of people whom have been defrauded

  • Stamford Magazine schemes

  • Stamford Office equipment schemes

  • Stamford Connecticut Lottery ticket schemes

  • Stamford Tax payment schemes

  • Stamford Vending machine fraud

  • Stamford Loan schemes

  • Stamford Jury service fraud schemes

In general, Stamford Connecticut telemarketing schemes involve promising something of value over the telephone and the victim has made not delivering it after payment. Such charges can also involve obtaining credit card information by telephone and then making use of the victim’s credit. If you have been accused of operating a Stamford CT telemarketing scheme along these lines, it is in your best interests to seek legal counsel right away.

If you are facing any telemarketing fraud charges in Stamford, you can be assured that Wise Laws will help in defending you effectively, working to recognize weaknesses in the prosecution’s case that lead to reasonable doubt among members of the jury.